cid 0ed7fbbcb73217441ec90c4da40810aec1b7799a891dc0a60a5de9008eea3481 · original · via openalex
Title: Derrida on the Mend Authors: Kenneth K. Inada; Robert R. Magliola Venue: Buddhist-Christian Studies Year: 1985 Canonical: doi:10.2307/1390311 URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/1390311 Collector: openalex OA: false ABSTRACT The pun built into its title, Derrida the Mend, suggests the thesis of this book. Derrida is indeed astride the whereby logocentrists (theorists who believe in organic unity) think to repair the rents in organicism. Derrida is indeed devouring the mend, but his quandary is that he must use logic (a logocentric operation) to do so. For Derrida to be on the mend in the other sense activating the pun, a means must be found to heal the quandary while preserving deconstruction. This book argues for such a means: the author finds in Nagarjuna, a Buddhist rationalist of the first century A.D, the same three deconstructive techniques used by Derrida. Nagarjuna, however, is able to reinstate logic and organicism while continuing the deconstructive process. He does so through his specialized versions of the Buddhist two truths, a solution which our author adopts, adapts, and universalizes. The book has four parts. The first provides a lengthy explication and critique of Derrida, a service still much needed by today's philosophers and literary theorists. The second part locates a recension of Heideggerian thought at a site the author calls centric mysticism. Throughout this section, there are original applications to literature. The third part presents the full-scale analysis of Nagarjunist technique, and then goes to develop a differential Zen contrasting very much with the centric Zen of Suzuki. Replete with treatments of Buddhist poetry, it is bound to be of great interest to Buddhologists. The fourth part applies differentialism to monotheism and Christian theology and develops a nonentitative trinitarianism, which will revise, it is hoped, contemporary theology significantly. Two appendices, in a concrete way, apply to literary theory and criticism what the author has worked out in the body of the book.